Snyder Asks Planning Staff About Citizens’ T-Zone Concerns
Video: Stoddard admits that latest changes fail to address citizen concerns about height, setbacks, stepbacks, and coverage.
Video: Stoddard admits that latest changes fail to address citizen concerns about height, setbacks, stepbacks, and coverage.
PDF: Address, owner, usage, size, value and year built of each T-Zone property. Map attached.
Video: Arborist says that brick pavers are extremely expensive to install and require more maintenance than concrete sidewalks.
City arborist wants reduced lot coverage, citing stormwater concerns in T-Zone proposal. Supports 20ft front and rear setbacks to allow for 15% tree canopy.
The Park Avenue 60% design images from the consultant Volkert, Inc. including impacts on existing trees.
Video: Citizens comment on proposal’s missed opportunity to build needed housing, bias towards developers, permissible building size, environmental impacts, streetscape.
City Manager says dedicated bike lanes would result in loss of street parking and harm businesses. A “Bike Boulevard” is proposed instead.
Developers want higher lot coverage and impervious surface limits, and lower setbacks in revised T-Zone code. 60% coverage is OK for townhouses.
Video: The Planning Commission bows to developer demands, allows bigger structures and narrower setbacks through the Special Use Permit (SUP) process.