Citizens React To T-Zone Proposal (Part I)
Excerpts from a selection of more than 150 letters from citizens, mostly in opposition to the T-Zone proposal.
Excerpts from a selection of more than 150 letters from citizens, mostly in opposition to the T-Zone proposal.
Video: Stoddard admits that latest changes fail to address citizen concerns about height, setbacks, stepbacks, and coverage.
PDF: Address, owner, usage, size, value and year built of each T-Zone property. Map attached.
City arborist wants reduced lot coverage, citing stormwater concerns in T-Zone proposal. Supports 20ft front and rear setbacks to allow for 15% tree canopy.
Video: Citizens comment on proposal’s missed opportunity to build needed housing, bias towards developers, permissible building size, environmental impacts, streetscape.
Developers want higher lot coverage and impervious surface limits, and lower setbacks in revised T-Zone code. 60% coverage is OK for townhouses.
Video: The Planning Commission bows to developer demands, allows bigger structures and narrower setbacks through the Special Use Permit (SUP) process.
Video: The Vietnamese community fears higher rents, criticizes the City’s lack of outreach on East End Small Area Plan.