Rebuttal: Let’s Really Spill The Tea On T-Zones!
In a cartoon video about the proposed T-Zone changes, Falls Church City fails to acknowledge citizen opposition and developer involvement. Hence, our rebuttal.
In a cartoon video about the proposed T-Zone changes, Falls Church City fails to acknowledge citizen opposition and developer involvement. Hence, our rebuttal.
Hardi, Connelly, Duncan, Hiscott and Lian vote for the first reading of the latest T-Zone proposal, while Tarter and Snyder continue to express grave concerns.
An analysis of who wins and loses in the new T-Zone proposal, by William Fred Thompson. Developers benefit at the expense of citizens.
Latest turn in the evolution of T-Zone proposals shows citizen concerns about building size and setbacks, affordable housing, environment, have not been addressed.
Tarter – micromanaging price; Hardi – higher and bigger; Snyder – no attempt at T-zone compromise; Duncan – sorry about your view
City staff raises height and increase the T-zone density, reduces tree canopy and adds more by-right features.
Staff abandoned 10% ADUs in favor of larger units with up to 17% ADUs. Some Council members preferred more units rather than bigger ones, with a focus on the “missing middle”.
Citizens provided analyses to support their views, and more letters. Reactions were also printed in the Falls Church News Press.
Excerpts from a selection of more than 150 letters from citizens, mostly in opposition to the T-Zone proposal.